Thriller Guy’s wife, Mrs.
Thriller Guy, (MTG) often complains that the entries in this blog are
too “inside
baseball.” For those not familiar with this metaphor, TG always supposed the
general meaning was that it means talking about a subject in detail that would
appear boring to those not intimately involved in the subject. I.e. going on
and on about the minutia and difficulties of The Writing Life until readers
want to shout, shut up and just tell us the titles of some good thrillers. TG
agrees: Guilty as charged. And before getting to today’s subject, TG can’t help but go
just a bit further with the examination of the origins of the term “inside
baseball.” Why? Because that's just the kind of guy TG is. It turns out that while TG’s meaning is correct, it refers not to
simply talking about the sport of baseball in numbing detail, it refers to a particular style of play,
sometimes also called “scientific baseball.” This is a style supposedly
developed by the Baltimore Orioles back around 1910 that featured concentration
on the small elements of the game: walks, bunts, base hits, and stolen bases,
rather than home runs and other big plays. Who knew? Those who are whacky enough to look into this matter at even greater depth can start here with Wikipedia.
Onward to today’s subject: the struggle to make sense of the publishing
business from the viewpoint of those who are completely indispensible to it:
the writers. Those without whom there would be no business, and yet those who, at
least most of them, are at the bottom end of the pay structure. It has
always been thus, but with the rise of independent publishing and
self-publishing it has seemed for some time that new possibilities are arising for writers to manage
their own careers, output and financial rewards. But there has been little solid evidence for these possibilities. Until now. A new report on the important
site, Author Earnings, shows that these opportunities are indeed real
and that there is a body of statistics to back it up. TG suggests those who
want all the details, and this should be anyone who is in the business of
publishing on any level, should read the entire report here. The report is long, detailed, and at times the charts are difficult to make
sense of, but it’s important to take the time and sift through it and figure it
out.
Here are some of the takeaways
from the report without the charts to get you interested. These are pulled
directly from the report without any input from TG.
The Tenured vs. Debut Author Report
In our most recent earnings
report, one chart jumped out at us and begged for deeper analysis:
It was a look at daily author earnings according to publication date, and it
revealed the heavy reliance Big 5 publishers have on the sale of their backlist
titles. The same chart showed, less surprisingly, that self-published authors
are making the vast majority of their earnings on recently published works. In
a single chart we were witness to the economic effects of new participants
entering an industry in which they were formerly uncompetitive. The same chart
made it apparent that the effects self-publishing will have on the trade book
industry have only just begun.
Because of this chart, we began looking more deeply at
authors from two different camps: those who debuted prior to the explosion of
self-publishing and those who debuted after. Authors getting their start today
will of course be joining the latter camp. And we believe those authors will
want to know the following:
• Big-5 publishers are massively reliant on their most
established authors to the tune of 63% of their e-book revenue.
• Roughly 46% of traditional
publishing’s fiction dollars are coming from e-books.
• Very few authors who debut with major publishers make
enough money to earn a living—and modern advances don’t cover the difference.
• In absolute numbers, more self-published authors are
earning a living wage today than Big-5 authors.
• When comparing debut authors who have equal time on the
market, the difference between self-published and Big-5 authors is even
greater.
In this report, we will also reveal how e-book
earnings represent roughly 64% of a traditionally published fiction author’s
income, and therefore why authors should focus less on statistics
geared toward publisher earnings and trade bookstore sales and consider their
own incomes instead. Finally, we will tackle the difficult question of just how
many authors are earning a living wage today. The results are sobering. I’ll
spoil it for you and say that there aren’t many. But there are reasons to
celebrate. Read on to see why.
Roughly 46% of traditional
publishing’s fiction dollars are coming from e-books, while the
other 54% comes from print sales, audiobooks, and other formats. On the
non-fiction side, e-books make up a far smaller fraction of gross dollar
revenues: only 20%.
For the average traditionally-published fiction author, this
means 59% of unit sales are now e-books.
While only 32% of the publishing industry’s gross
revenue currently comes from e-books, nearly 64% of the average
traditionally-published fiction author’s earnings is coming from their
e-books. Earnings for the average genre-fiction author will skew even further
toward their e-book sales.
There are far more indie debut authors from 2010, 2011,
2012, and 2013 who are now holding spots on the Amazon bestseller charts than
Big-5 debut authors. Even more striking, the number of today’s bestsellers
from these “New” indie debut authors increases steeply year-over-year, while
the number of today’s bestsellers from “New” Big-5 debut authors stays flat.
The number of today’s bestsellers from small to medium publisher debut authors
is also growing year over year, although not at the same explosive rate with
which indie debuts are grabbing and holding slots on the charts.
After years and years of querying and jumping through
gatekeeper hoops, it appears that even the less-than-1% who are lucky enough to
land an agent and a Big-5 publishing contract can’t manage to quit their day
jobs. (This is an observation in the data that matches what we have
seen anecdotally in the publishing and bookselling trenches).
By contrast, we see over 700 Indie-published authors who debuted
in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 who are today earning more than $25,000/year
from their Kindle e-books alone. For these authors, e-book sales on other
platforms and POD print sales will add another 20%-30% on average to this
total. It’s easy to see that, for the past 4 years, and even taking lost print
sales into consideration, far more Indie authors than Big-5 authors are
earning a living wage from their writing.
Does this mean that earning a living as an author is likely?
Absolutely not. Here is where optimism for self-publishing is often mistaken
for naïveté. It’s where excitement leads erroneously to a gold rush mentality.
Let’s take an example from sports: Aspiring basketball players know
precisely how many roster slots exist in the NBA. (30 teams with 15 roster
spots each). Aspiring writers are not so lucky. We have no idea how many slots
are open for us as we begin to dream of writing for a living. Many of us
hopeful writers grew up browsing bookstores with the misguided impression that
all of those tens of thousands of authors we see on the shelves were writing
for a living. The vast majority are not.
Yes, millions of people dream of writing for a living.
Yes, becoming one of those people is difficult. But it’s never been more
likely for those willing to put in the effort. You don’t have to be in the
top 200 to 300 of fiction writers to earn a living these days. You can be in
the top 2,000 to 3,000. That’s an enormous improvement. And yet it goes largely
uncommented on and unnoticed. We hope to highlight this trend for all those
with manuscripts in-hand and a decision to make.
Final Thoughts
The picture that is emerging from our data collection and
our look at bestseller churn is that the number of Big-5 debuts at each earning
level is relatively flat, year over year, while the number of
living-wage-earning indie author debuts is growing exponentially year over
year. Even ignoring the hurdles and roadblocks that are a built-in part of
traditional publishing’s drawn-out querying process, it’s easy to see which
method of publishing represents the greater and faster-growing opportunity to
earn a living wage as a writer. Again, the data matches everything we are
seeing in the publishing community trenches. And these observations help to explain
many of the restrictions we see in modern publishing contracts.
To combat these trends, we believe that major publishers are
going to have to pay higher royalties on e-book sales in the very near future.
We have heard from some authors and industry insiders that this is already
taking place. Unfortunately, the sweetest deals are going to existing
bestsellers, which means the rich get richer while debuting authors are left
behind. This must change. Higher royalties will have to become the new standard
across the board. Otherwise, the word will keep spreading—both anecdotally and
through hard data—that the choice on how to publish keeps tilting toward
retaining ownership of one’s art. We’re not saying this decision will ever be
simple. But it sure seems to be getting easier and easier.
TG here. See, there
is hope. And as readers of this blog know well, hope is often the only thing TG
can give writers to keep them at their desks, or at least in front of their
computers, staring at that blank page, working and dreaming.
No comments:
Post a Comment