I recently watched the third entry in the James Patterson how-to-write-a-novel,
Master Class series, (see entry below) and I continue to be impressed with it.
But I’m only three chapters in, so we won’t draw any conclusions yet. He’s got
plenty of time to piss me off.
This entry was on Ideas
and Where to Come Up With Them. Patterson’s delivery remains accessible and
amusing and while there were no great surprises, I didn’t expect him to come up
with anything really out-of-the-box. He says that sometimes his ideas spring
from a title that occurs to him, or just a scene he sees on the street. Thriller
Guy has covered this topic a number of times. I was mildly surprised to hear
Patterson say that there weren’t really that many absolutely original ideas anyway,
so what you might do is look for several disparate ideas and then find new ways
to link them together rather than beating your brains out searching for an
absolutely original conception. That’s
excellent advice. Thriller Guy’s friend, Dan, a noted biography author, told me
once that because it’s so difficult to come up with a bio subject that no one
has written about, the smarter thing is to come up with two people who are
already known and then find a new way to link them together. Good advice that could
be applied to many areas of non-fiction, as well as fiction.
Patterson says to read, read, read. Learn things; that’s
where ideas come from. TG would add that the Internet is a great place to
follow these kinds of threads from one interesting idea to another, so don’t
feel guilty if you’re wasting your time surfing around, hoovering up stray
factoids and perusing random articles that catch your interest. What you’re
doing is called Basic Research. But remember, at some point you need to put
down the mouse and sit in a chair, preferably outside, away from the computer
and simply think. You need to make
your brain consider all those interesting ideas you’ve come upon while surfing,
and think of ways to turn them into plots. As TG has noted many times, it’s a
painful process, but it has to be done. Not only when you’re thinking an idea
up for a novel, but while you’re working on it, at any stage -- outline, first
draft, later drafts, final draft. Patterson uses his novel Honeymoon as an example. I’ve never read it, but the basic idea is
simple: a woman is a bigamist. Good idea. Almost everything you read about
bigamists comes from the angle that it’s the man who’s always the perp. Patterson
goes on to describe Honeymoon. The
plot is what you might come up with once you accept the female premise: the
woman is a “black widow” who is killing her husbands, an FBI guy sees something
funny about the murder cases, the FBI guy falls for the woman even though he
knows it’s a terrible idea, etc. Nothing really revolutionary there, but the
basic idea is sound enough to build a good story on.
Patterson then adds more useful advice: if you can’t come up
with a new concept, come up with a new character, someone really original to
whatever genre you’re working in, or want to work in.
When you do come up with something, he continues, run it by
a friend or two and see if it elicits a “tell me more” response. If it does,
you may be onto something.
He then says to write down these ideas and keep them in an
idea folder. Later on when you’re casting about for a new idea for a new
project, you can go through the folder and see if anything leaps out at you. He
adds that he used to keep a notebook by his bed, and if he came up with an idea
in the night he made himself get up and write it down. This is standard
Thriller Guy advice. Patterson no longer does that. He says that if you have an
idea in the night and you don’t write it down and you forget it the next day
that it must not have been a very good idea anyway. Not in my brain, James. If
I forget an idea, it’s usually because I forget lots of things, especially
stuff having to do with nebulous, or not so nebulous, fiction projects. But he’s a big supporter of keeping a notebook
to jot down ideas and other raw material for whatever you’re working on.
OK, all good, solid information. Now it’s time to get down
to business. I’m going to work along with my master, James, on a new book. Hey,
I paid $90 for this program, I might as well use it. Here’s my plot idea, which
was sparked by my writer pal Larry while we were at lunch. Actually, early in
this lesson Patterson says that asking friends for a novel concept is a very
good idea. I’ve got some very good writer friends who are always up for this
sort of activity, and over the years I’ve picked up many good plot concepts and
had ongoing help from these folks while working on my many novels.
Larry’s idea: A guy who is a book critic writes a review of
a book (mystery or thriller) and sends it to his editor. After awhile, he
notices that the review he wrote never appears in the magazine. He emails his
editor to ask why, and the editor says what review? What book? He doesn’t
understand what the writer is asking about.
One of the reasons that this is an intriguing idea is that
I’m a book reviewer, I write for a magazine and I have an excellent editor.
I’ve often wondered after reading a particularly chilling or tech-heavy book, if
terrorists and spies read thriller fiction. Is there a danger that they might
pick up useful information from these books? So I began thinking about this
setup and came up with these initial questions: what’s the book the reviewer is
reviewing? Why did the editor say he’s never heard of the book or ever assigned
him the review? And why does the editor turn up dead a week after the writer
asks him these questions?
Anyone out there want to help? Joel, you with me on
this? Anyone else? Chime in with your
ideas and we’ll start to build a book the Patterson way. Who knows, maybe we’ll
make a million bucks.
Wow, that certainly puts a new spin on a 'Novel' concept.
ReplyDeleteThe book he could be reviewing is likely to be a book like some you have reviewed, where someone who works in the 'trade' decides to write a novel based on a real life mission or experiences and gets picked up by a publisher because of the usual reasons you've talked to me about. Perhaps it's crap. Another reason to question it with the Editor...
Maybe the book was not really an Advanced Readers Copy but was meant to appear as one - something intended to be hiding in plain sight but was actually a mission plan that was going to be hand delivered to a covert group whose 'cover' is a group of writers meeting at a workshop - whose purpose is to 'edit' the story but are actually updating and refining mission parameters - and because the editor suspected that these 'special' reviewer copy books were coinciding to real life events he sent the protagonist one because he began to get worried he was learning about something very dangerous - this particular copy was about a plot to assassinate the president. When the protagonist began to question the book - the editor played dumb because he was given an 'or else' threat...
Then again, someone had to have written the book - and perhaps the reviewer recognizes something unique about the style of writing that helps him identify that the real villain is a popular best selling author who writes an enormous amount of books and does writing seminars...
My two cents....
ReplyDeleteThe reviewer- still shocked over his editor's death- also discovers that the courier who delivered the book ( which is in very limited numbers as an Advance Readers Copy) has also died.
With the ARC as his only lead....he rapidly finds out that the address printed in the ARC about the publisher is false as is the writer of the book. So, who wrote it? And why? It's a very good thriller and as he re-reads it he discovers that a few things in the plot of the book have been coming true on the evening news! Finally, on the way home his car gets sideswiped and knocked off the road.
He survives the crash but....
He's angry now.
And determined to find out what's going on!